A proposal to the elected leadership of Charlottesville about their Robert E Lee statue

A proposal to the elected leadership of Charlottesville about their Robert E Lee statue:

CONCEPT



I propose this: 1) "topple" Lee at an angle (akin to images of historical toppling of Stalin, George III, Ceaucescu, Hitler, and Hussein statues); 2) leave Lee dangling there at the partly-toppled angle (with some manner of concealed steel support to keep him at the proper angle); 3) perhaps remove Lee's heroic appearance with a coat of pink, lavender, yellow, or baby blue paint; 4) wrap the statue with a wall-like surround (maybe lettering on iron ribbon-slabs at a 15-20 foot distance) with words explaining the new attitude: "Confederate General Lee led Confederate soldiers in a quest to preserve a white-supremacist rebel government; And at one time in the Jim Crow era, enough Southerners approved of this thinking that a costly monumental statue like this could be erected with the support of many local leaders and voters around 50 years later --in a changed form, symbolically 'toppled'-- we preserve it today only to remind ourselves of historical wrongs and to remember our own guilt, whether collective or individual." This recontextualized statue could be a world "first" and would be in the spirit of "free speech" capitol Charlottesville: we are not obliterating the evidence of our past attitude, but we are instead boldly confronting it and remembering it as we move forward.

NOTES / TALKING POINTS (yes, they are)

The Robert E Lee statue in recently-renamed Emancipation Park (the former Lee Park) has long been (and, sadly, continues to be) a focal point for neo-Confederate sentiment. Also, its presence on city-owned land creates the impression of municipal support for such sentiment. (Really? In progressive Charlottesville?) After the defeat of Jim Crow and segregation and "massive resistance" to desegregation, that's a problem.

While Lee was a military leader celebrated in some circles, he also led warfighters in deadly armed conflict in the name of political ideas against the United States government. Seen through a post-Oklahoma City Bombing and post-September Eleventh lens, Lee could be considered a leader of terrorists. (Violence --killing people-- in the name of political ideals, "hmmmmm.") Whether Lee himself supported the national curse of slavery (or whether a majority of his troops did, or whether any particular constituent's great-great-granddadddy who was a Confederate officer did, et cetera) is moot because the Confederacy's own leadership said (openly!) that white supremacy was among their founding ideals. (Any unReconstructed neo-rebs who at this point reflexively insist, "No! T'was only states' rights," need to read the Cornerstone Speech [ wiki ] of Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens, who said that the cornerstone of the CSA "rest[ed] upon the great truth (sic) that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery --subordination to the superior race-- is his natural and normal condition." CS VEEP Stephens continued, "This, our new government, is the first in the history of the world based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth." That haughty declaration, today, seems shameful; yet, at the time, it was sincere and popular. The notion that the Confederacy and its symbols represent "heritage, not hate" is a modern and apologist one; it wasn't bumper-stickered on the farm wagons of the 1860s. Again, the declared "cornerstone" of the Confederacy was belief in white supremacy, and it wasn't revisionist historians or "outside agitators" who said it: it was Confederate national leadership.

And these leaders were idolized. They were made legendary heroes. Once the patrolling Union soldiers of Reconstruction were gone, monumental heroic sculptures were commissioned. Townspeople throughout the South supported this unfortunate hero-worship. They gathered at such monuments on occasions of remembrance for their race-based Lost Cause. Many a Klu Klux Klan parade started or ended at such sites in the South back when KKK activity was practiced more openly.

In an era when most Americans finally do adhere to our country's founding principles without regard to race, what do we do with Jim Crow's elaborate and expensive monuments to the segregationists' heroes? Confederate apologists often cite a straw man slipery slope arguement: "If we take down Lee or Davis statues, what next? Take Washington and Jefferson statues away? They were slave-owners, after all." The 10 million or so listeners of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and Mark Levin --among other radio talkers-- keep hearing versions of this talk. The political radio hosts really should reconsider. Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Washington, Jackson, et al were (whatever their individual faults) founders of the United States of America, not of an openly white-supremacist and quasi-terrorist military rebellion against our country. The Founders may be honored as founders. Future generations may take up whether to re-evaluate them.

But what of Lee?

The radio talkers speak of "erasing history." How "odd" that erasing history never comes up when considering that Berlin's Adolph Hitler Platz was renamed (rightfully, of course) after World War II. Somehow, it is ooooooonly an issue with them when American local governments take a stand against "tradition" --even racist tradition. The radio men and Fox News commentators somehow miss that MUNICIPAL PROPERTIES HONORING LEADERS OF RACE-SUPREMACIST MOVEMENTS could be: 1) unwelcoming of non-majority tourists and visitors; 2) encouraging, through government endorsement and upkeep, the ideals which led to such monuments' erection; 3) fostering continuing extremist sentiment; 4) implying continued public or governmental agreement with the racist beliefs; 5) acting just downright uncivil and rude.

What the radio hosts keep failing to see is that a people can still remember their history, including the regrettable parts, without maintaining taxpayer-funded support of the monuments and pilgrimage sites of the overthrown regime (and/or its later apologists). Germany has learned this lesson of its many Nazi-era places. Regrettably, the post-war American South was not so effectively occupied, and so it was able to incrementally re-establish white-supremacist culture. One cannot imagine Germany of the 1970s putting up Himmler, Rommel, or Hitler statues; yet, in the 1880s to 1960s, almost every county in the South saw erection of CSA monuments. (Local memorials to local dead and wounded soldiers for local remembrance are a different category; monuments to the national leadership with no connection to local troops are at issue here.)

And what of Lee?

The options being keep Lee there or remove Lee, let me propose a third path: recontextualize Lee.

Once again, I propose this: 1) "topple" Lee at an angle (akin to images of historical toppling of Stalin, George III, Ceaucescu, Hitler, and Hussein statues); 2) leave Lee dangling there at the partly-toppled angle (with some manner of concealed steel support to keep him at the proper angle); 3) perhaps remove Lee's heroic appearance with a coat of pink, lavender, yellow, or baby blue paint; 4) wrap the statue with a wall-like surround (maybe lettering on iron ribbon-slabs at a 15-20 foot distance) with words explaining the new attitude: "Confederate General Lee led Confederate soldiers in a quest to preserve a white-supremacist rebel government; And at one time in the Jim Crow era, enough Southerners approved of this thinking that a costly monumental statue like this could be erected with the support of many local leaders and voters around 50 years later --in a changed form, symbolically 'toppled'-- we preserve it today only to remind ourselves of historical wrongs and to remember our own guilt, whether collective or individual." This recontextualized statue could be a world "first" and would be in the spirit of "free speech" capitol Charlottesville: we are not obliterating the evidence of our past attitude, but we are instead boldly confronting it and remembering it as we move forward.

The art would be preserved, the old historical attitude would be not covered-up, the transformed site becomes a place for peaceful contemplation of the societal changes. Perhaps organizations which would have fought legally for removal could contribute some of the saved court costs toward the transformation.

- - -

Top.

Scrapbook's Other / Misc sub-page.



- - -


Shortcut URL to this page:
http://tinyurl.com/cville-lee-fix